Loading...
How efficiently is the company using your money? These two ratios answer that.
Suppose you give โน1 lakh to two friends to start businesses. Friend A returns โน20,000 profit in a year. Friend B returns โน8,000. Who ran the better business? Obviously Friend A โ they generated a 20% return on your money vs 8%.
This is exactly what ROE (Return on Equity) and ROCE (Return on Capital Employed) measure for companies โ how much profit they generate for every rupee of capital invested. A company can show high profits in absolute terms; what matters is how much capital it needed to generate those profits.
Warren Buffett famously calls ROE one of his top criteria. His ideal company earns high returns on equity without taking on excessive debt. That combination โ high ROE + low debt โ is the fingerprint of a compounding machine.
Formula
PAT = Profit After Tax ย |ย Shareholders' Equity = Total Assets โ Total Liabilities
ROE tells you: for every โน100 of shareholders' money sitting in the business, how many rupees of profit did the company generate? A 20% ROE means โน20 of profit per โน100 of equity. Consistent 20%+ ROE over 5-10 years is the hallmark of a quality business.
Formula
EBIT = Earnings Before Interest & Tax ย |ย Capital Employed = Total Assets โ Current Liabilities
ROCE goes one step beyond ROE โ it measures profitability on all capital used, including debt. This makes it better for comparing companies with different debt levels. It answers: regardless of how this business is funded (equity or debt), how efficiently is it deploying capital?
A ROCE higher than the cost of debt (i.e., the interest rate on borrowings) means the company is creating value. If ROCE is lower than its cost of borrowing, the company is destroying wealth โ every rupee of debt is costing more than it earns.
For debt-free or low-debt companies (TCS, Infosys, Nestle). ROE directly tells you what shareholders are earning. Also better for comparing companies within a sector that have similar capital structures.
For capital-intensive businesses (steel, cement, infrastructure) or when comparing companies with very different debt levels. ROCE normalises for debt, giving a cleaner picture of operational efficiency.
Asset-light businesses consistently outperform capital-heavy ones on ROE/ROCE (illustrative figures):
| Company | Sector | ROE | ROCE | D/E |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Nestle India | FMCG | 80%+ | 85%+ | ~0 |
| TCS | IT Services | 45% | 55% | ~0 |
| Asian Paints | Paints/FMCG | 28% | 35% | 0.1x |
| Tata Steel | Steel | 12% | 10% | 0.8x |
| Adani Ports | Infrastructure | 15% | 11% | 1.2x |
* Illustrative. Asset-light businesses naturally generate higher returns on capital โ that's their moat.
ROE can be high for different reasons. DuPont analysis breaks it down into three drivers so you understand why it's high:
How much profit from each rupee of sales. High margin = pricing power or cost efficiency.
How efficiently assets generate revenue. High turnover = asset-light or fast inventory cycle.
How much of the assets are funded by debt. Higher = more debt. ROE boosted by debt is dangerous.
The best companies have high ROE driven by high margins and efficient asset use โ not by borrowing heavily. If ROE is high but leverage is very high too, dig deeper before investing.
Don't Compare ROE Across Sectors
Banks have naturally high leverage (your deposits are their liabilities), so their ROE appears high but is not comparable to FMCG. For banks, use ROA (Return on Assets) and NIM (Net Interest Margin) instead. Always compare like-for-like โ sector vs sector.
Key Takeaway
Look for companies with 20%+ ROE and ROCE consistently over 5+ years, with low or no debt. That combination means the business is genuinely excellent โ not artificially inflated by leverage. Use DuPont analysis to understand the source of the returns. The best Indian compounders (TCS, Asian Paints, Nestle, Page Industries) all share this trait.